[11u] RFR: JDK-8255734: VM should ignore SIGXFSZ on ppc64, s390 too

[Thomas Stüfe]

 Thanks, Martin.

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 3:20 PM Doerr, Martin <martin.doerr at sap.com> wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
>
> backport looks good. Thanks for doing it.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On
> > Behalf Of Thomas Stüfe
> > Sent: Montag, 30. November 2020 13:39
> > To: HotSpot Open Source Developers <hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net>;
> > jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> > Subject: [11u] RFR: JDK-8255734: VM should ignore SIGXFSZ on ppc64, s390
> > too
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > may I have reviews please for the following backport:
> >
> > Original issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8255734
> > Original patch: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/54c88132.diff
> > Modified patch:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/backports/8255734-VM-
> > should-ignore-SIGXFSZ-on-ppc64-s390-too.diff
> >
> > Patch is trivial and nothing changed, but did not apply correctly since
> > "8252324: Signal related code should be shared among POSIX platforms"
> > shuffled a lot of coding around.
> >
> > Thanks, Thomas
>