Integrated: 8253540: InterpreterRuntime::monitorexit should be a JRT_LEAF function
Coleen Phillimore
coleenp at openjdk.java.net
Mon Sep 28 15:51:44 UTC 2020
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:32:21 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org> wrote:
> That the monitor has already been unlocked, or is a null stacklock monitor has been already checked in the caller, so
> the code that makes it a JRT_ENTRY_NO_ASYNC is unnecessary.
> Making it a JRT_LEAF like the compiled method entries makes it safer. We know it can never safepoint and
> unintentionally install a async exception.
> Tested with tier1-6.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 77a0f399
Author: Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org>
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/77a0f399
Stats: 73 lines in 10 files changed: 9 ins; 28 del; 36 mod
8253540: InterpreterRuntime::monitorexit should be a JRT_LEAF function
Reviewed-by: rehn, mdoerr, dcubed, pchilanomate
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/320
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list