RFR: 8278241: Implement JVM SpinPause on linux-aarch64 [v2]
Stuart Monteith
smonteith at openjdk.java.net
Mon Dec 13 17:28:15 UTC 2021
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:56:02 GMT, Evgeny Astigeevich <duke at openjdk.java.net> wrote:
>> This JVM SpinPause uses a spin wait stub. The stub is generated based on the `SpinWait` description which is defined with `OnSpinWaitInst`/`OnSpinWaitInstCount` options. The `SpinWait` provides the description of the instruction and the instruction count.
>>
>> The `SpinWait` description is also used for the `_onSpinWait()` intrinsic. We don't have use cases when we need different implementations for the `_onSpinWait()` intrinsic and JVM SpinPause.
>>
>> Testing results for fastdebug and release builds:
>> - `gtest`: Passed
>> - `tier1`...`tier4`: Passed
>> - `hotspot/jtreg/runtime/Thread/TestSpinPause.java`: Passed
>>
>> JVM SpinPause is used for the synchronised statements and can benchmarked with `org.openjdk.bench.vm.lang.LockUnlock.testContendedLock`.
>>
>> Benchmarking results (number of samples per an experiment: 150) for Graviton2 (Neoverse N1), 1 ISB instruction:
>>
>>
>>
>> +-----------+-------------------+------------+-----------+-----------+----------+---------+
>> | CPU cores | Contended threads | Base ns/op | Error | New | Error | Diff |
>> +-----------+-------------------+------------+-----------+-----------+----------+---------+
>> | 8 | 64 | 10007.213 | ±910.911 | 8527.346 | ±377.242 | -14.79% |
>> | 16 | 64 | 10274.935 | ±880.568 | 8310.433 | ±326.845 | -19.12% |
>> | 32 | 64 | 12231.947 | ±1525.364 | 9205.941 | ±394.409 | -24.74% |
>> | 64 | 64 | 9929.49 | ±586.074 | 10488.695 | ±570.458 | 5.63% |
>> | 64 | 32 | 5605.119 | ±629.340 | 5023.882 | ±230.639 | -10.37% |
>> | 64 | 16 | 2817.346 | ±263.696 | 2367.528 | ±94.158 | -15.97% |
>> | 64 | 2 | 870.389 | ±530.579 | 464.395 | ±126.260 | -46.65% |
>> +-----------+-------------------+------------+-----------+-----------+----------+---------+
>
> Evgeny Astigeevich has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Reimplement JVM SpinPause with using stub code
src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_aarch64/os_linux_aarch64.cpp line 387:
> 385: if (VM_Version::spin_wait_desc().inst() == SpinWait::NONE) {
> 386: return 0;
> 387: }
Would it be safe and more efficient to test func for NULL?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6803
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list