RFR: 8278602: CDS dynamic dump may access unloaded classes
Stefan Karlsson
stefank at openjdk.java.net
Thu Dec 16 08:33:04 UTC 2021
On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 03:46:10 GMT, Ioi Lam <iklam at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Cause of crash:
>
> When dumping a CDS archive, while iterating over entries of the `SystemDictionaryShared::_dumptime_table`, we do not check whether the classes are already unloaded. In the crash, we are trying to call `InstanceKlass::signer()` but the class has already been unloaded.
>
> Fix:
>
> Override the template function `DumpTimeSharedClassTable::iterate` to ensure iteration safety. Do not iterate over a class if its `class_loader_data` is no longer alive.
>
> The assert in `DumpTimeSharedClassTable::IterationHelper` found another existing bug -- we were calling `SystemDictionaryShared::is_dumptime_table_empty()` without holding the `DumpTimeTable_lock`. I delayed the call until we have grabbed the lock.
>
> Testing:
>
> I have attached a test case into the bug report. Without the fix, it would reproduce the same crash in less than a minute. With the fix, the crash is no longer reproducible.
>
> Unfortunately, the test case requires a ZGC patch (thanks to @stefank) that adds delays to increase the likelihood of seeing unloaded classes inside the `_dumptime_table`. Therefore, I cannot integrate the test as a jtreg test. I'll mark the bug as **noreg-hard**
I've reviewed the interaction of the klasses in the _dumptime_table with the new is_loader_alive() check. I don't know the reset of the CDS code to know if the other changes are correct or not. I spotted something that looks weird:
src/hotspot/share/classfile/systemDictionaryShared.cpp line 194:
> 192: _dump_in_progress = true;
> 193: }
> 194:
Did you really intend to set _dump_in_progress to true in stop_dumping()? start_dumping() also sets it to true.
-------------
Changes requested by stefank (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6859
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list