RFR: 8275908: Record null_check traps for calls and array_check traps in the interpreter

[Volker Simonis]

On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 09:58:19 GMT, Christian Hagedorn <chagedorn at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> `null_checks` occurring at invoke bytecodes are currently not recorded by the profiler. This leads to unnecessary uncommon traps, deoptimizations and recompilations for exceptions which already occurred before the compilation (i.e. are "hot"). This change fixes the problem in the interpreter.
>> 
>> `array_checks` are currently recorded as `class_checks` in the interpreter and therefore not recognized by the compiler. This again leads to uncommon traps, deoptimizations and recompilations. This change unifies the handling of `array_checks` in the interpreter and compiler and prevents unnecessary recompilation.
>> 
>> The test is a stripped down version of a test which was developed for [JDK-8273563: Improve performance of implicit exceptions with -XX:-OmitStackTraceInFastThrow](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273563) (still [under review](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/5488)). It introduces an extension to the Whitebox API to expose the decompile, deopt and trap counters which is also required for testing [JDK-8273563](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273563). I think (and hope) it will also be helpful for others in the future.
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/exceptions/OptimizeImplicitExceptions.java line 287:
> 
>> 285:                 checkTwo(testMode, impExcp, lastException, throwImplicitException_m, invocations);
>> 286: 
>> 287:                 // Invoke compiled (or interpreted if JDK-8275908 isn't fixed) code 'Tier0InvokeNotifyFreq' times.
> 
> As this is the fix for JDK-8275908, you can remove the comment about it :-) It's probably a leftover from JDK-
> 8273563.

Right :)
Fixed.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6541