RFR: 8227369: pd_disjoint_words_atomic() needs to be atomic [v2]

[David Holmes]

On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:20:11 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Looks fine. There might be some performance implications to this, as IIRC this code gets called from GC copying, so some light benchmarking might be in order.
>
>> @shipilev any suggestions as to which benchmarks to try to run for this? Otherwise I'll just try our usual internal ones.
> 
> Just the usual sanity check of benchmarks is fine. If there are regressions on some other benchmarks, we can take care of them after integration.

Paging @shipilev - please see previous comment.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7567