RFR: 8295871: G1: Use different explicit claim marks for CLDs [v2]

[Thomas Schatzl]

On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 21:51:32 GMT, Albert Mingkun Yang <ayang at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Thomas Schatzl has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   rename claim bits
>
> src/hotspot/share/classfile/classLoaderData.hpp line 209:
> 
>> 207:     _claim_strong                   = 3,
>> 208:     _claim_strong_stw_fullgc_mark   = 4,
>> 209:     _claim_strong_stw_fullgc_adjust = 8,
> 
> I feel having `strong` in their names can be misleading -- there are no "finalizable" counterparts for them; IOW, there is only one kind of strength for `*_mark/adjust`. What do others think?

Done.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10989