RFR: 8295146: Clean up native code with newer C/C++ language features [v3]

[Kim Barrett]

On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:02:49 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Yep, it was renamed since the file is also named VISCPP, and I felt that matching the names was a good style change
>
> I think it is the file that has the "bad" name in this case. :( But okay.

I also think the macro name should be left alone.  It's the file suffix that is "bad", though I'm not convinced it's so bad as to be worth changing.  (There's also `TARGET_COMPILER_visCPP`.)

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11081