RFC: linux-aarch64 and LSE support

[Andrew Haley]

On 9/14/22 10:25, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> I am swayed by Kim's arguments that we should clean this up now. This is
> technical debt and the changes Kim wants to make imply an interest rate
> hike (extra development and maintenance).

OK, thanks. It seems to me to be more balanced: the current version has
(slightly) better performance and is more configurable, but I take your
point about maintenance.

-- 
Andrew Haley  (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671