Formatting on Windows

[Kim Barrett]

> On Jul 29, 2023, at 10:13 AM, Julian Waters <tanksherman27 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Thomas and David,
> 
> No worries, no discouragement taken. I don't mind the criticism, my only worry is that I haven't angered any reviewers recently these past few days. I actually started the efforts on behalf of the MSYS2 project (which primarily uses the gcc compiler and is in desperate need and want of a working JDK), so I'll put a break to the changes I've been making lately and let them decide on what to do going forward. I'll admit I've not been happy with how my changes have declined from high quality ones to being hard to review either, so hopefully I can return to properly helping out soon. Till then, thanks for the advice to both

Just because MSYS2 (or some other project) “needs" an OpenJDK port doesn’t mean the OpenJDK project
should be on the hook to provide it.  A port needs a maintainer organization that commits to providing
the necessary resources and can be trusted to follow through on that commitment.  (There are probably
other requirements, but that’s the first one.)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-dev/attachments/20230730/67f685d7/signature-0001.asc>