RFR: 8318225: RISC-V: C2 UModI
Vladimir Kempik
vkempik at openjdk.org
Fri Oct 27 11:27:30 UTC 2023
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:15:11 GMT, Hamlin Li <mli at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you review the change to add intrinsic for UModI and UModL?
> ( This is a quite similar patch to https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16346, which addresses UDivI and UDivL, so for the performance consideration please also check the discussion in that pr. )
> Thanks!
>
>
> ## Tests
>
> ### Functionality
> Run tests successfully found via `grep -nr test/jdk/ -we remainderUnsigned` and `grep -nr test/hotspot/ -we remainderUnsigned`
>
> ### Performance
>
> #### Long
> **NOTE: for positive divisor, it's the common case; for negative divisor, it's a rare case**
>
> **Before**
>
> LongDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 mixed avgt 10 21222.911 ± 57.735 ns/op
> LongDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 positive avgt 10 28841.429 ± 6.294 ns/op
> LongDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 negative avgt 10 7733.038 ± 3.856 ns/op
>
>
> **After**
>
> LongDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 mixed avgt 10 22666.448 ± 34.986 ns/op
> LongDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 positive avgt 10 15967.846 ± 24.805 ns/op
> LongDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 negative avgt 10 29507.865 ± 20.593 ns/op
>
>
> #### Integer
> **Before**
>
> IntegerDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 mixed avgt 10 23396.475 ± 24.065 ns/op
> IntegerDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 positive avgt 10 16796.796 ± 3.389 ns/op
> IntegerDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 negative avgt 10 30159.407 ± 6.716 ns/op
>
>
> **After**
>
> IntegerDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 mixed avgt 10 23216.710 ± 14.351 ns/op
> IntegerDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 positive avgt 10 16621.374 ± 3.203 ns/op
> IntegerDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 negative avgt 10 30002.088 ± 41.212 ns/op
So, you win 45% on
LongDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 positive
but loose almost 4x on
LongDivMod.testRemainderUnsigned 1024 negative
Does this intrinsic ( for LONGs) make sense at all? or better leave it as is ?
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16394#issuecomment-1782747969
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list