RFR: 8313202: MutexLocker should disallow null Mutexes [v5]

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 19:11:26 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I think there was a test failure that indicated we enter here from some error path? Let me reproduce it again.
>
> Got one: `vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/AddCapabilities/addcaps003/TestDescription.java`.
> 
> The reproducer is as simple as:
> 
> 
> % build/macosx-aarch64-server-fastdebug/images/jdk/bin/java -XX:+PrintInterpreter
> ...
> #
> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
> #
> #  Internal Error (/Users/shipilev/Work/shipilev-jdk/src/hotspot/share/runtime/mutexLocker.hpp:237), pid=85876, tid=8451
> #  assert(mutex != nullptr) failed: null mutex not allowed
> #
> 
> Stack: [0x000000016f740000,0x000000016f943000],  sp=0x000000016f942ba0,  free space=2058k
> Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
> V  [libjvm.dylib+0x12393b4]  VMError::report_and_die(int, char const*, char const*, char*, Thread*, unsigned char*, void*, void*, char const*, int, unsigned long)+0x564  (mutexLocker.hpp:237)
> V  [libjvm.dylib+0x1239bdc]  VMError::report_and_die(Thread*, char const*, int, unsigned long, VMErrorType, char const*, char*)+0x0
> V  [libjvm.dylib+0x566f50]  print_error_for_unit_test(char const*, char const*, char*)+0x0
> V  [libjvm.dylib+0x10fb084]  __cxx_global_var_init.43+0x0
> V  [libjvm.dylib+0x5998]  AbstractInterpreter::print()+0x180
> V  [libjvm.dylib+0x11522f0]  TemplateInterpreter::initialize_code()+0x12c
> V  [libjvm.dylib+0x86c1ec]  interpreter_init_code()+0x10
> V  [libjvm.dylib+0x83aedc]  init_globals2()+0x14
> V  [libjvm.dylib+0x118f7e0]  Threads::create_vm(JavaVMInitArgs*, bool*)+0x2f4
> V  [libjvm.dylib+0x99e7e0]  JNI_CreateJavaVM+0x7c
> C  [libjli.dylib+0xa344]  JavaMain+0x100
> C  [libjli.dylib+0xd4a0]  ThreadJavaMain+0xc
> C  [libsystem_pthread.dylib+0x6fa8]  _pthread_start+0x94

Thanks for chasing down the reason.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15043#discussion_r1316441710