RFR: 8330253: Skip verify_consistent_lock_order when deoptimizing from monitorenter bytecode. [v3]
Patricio Chilano Mateo
pchilanomate at openjdk.org
Thu Apr 18 19:19:02 UTC 2024
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:04:49 GMT, Dean Long <dlong at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Axel Boldt-Christmas has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Whitespace
>> - Spelling and typos
>
> src/hotspot/share/runtime/deoptimization.cpp line 451:
>
>> 449: if (!is_syncronized_entry && bc != Bytecodes::Code::_monitorenter) {
>> 450: deoptee_thread->lock_stack().verify_consistent_lock_order(lock_order, exec_mode != Deoptimization::Unpack_none);
>> 451: }
>
> The above checks would also hit the follow false positives:
> 1. deopt in counter overflow in prologue, not in monitorenter
> 2. monitorenter at bci 0 when raw_bci is -1 (assuming it got past the verifier)
> but seems mostly harmless to skip checks in those cases.
I thought the original check was fine. Could you elaborate on these 2 cases, I didn't really get them.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18782#discussion_r1571250149
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list