RFR: 8373114: Redundant MethodCounters in the preimage generated by training run

Igor Veresov iveresov at openjdk.org
Sun Dec 7 05:43:55 UTC 2025


On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 22:16:03 GMT, Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Details are mentioned in the bug report and this mail thread https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/leyden-dev/2025-December/002843.html
> After this patch the number of MethodCounters in the preimage are much less than before this patch. Also the number of MethodCounters in the preimage is the same as in the final AOTCache (these numbers are obtained using -Xlog:aot=trace).
> 
> Before this patch for the training run:
> 
> [18.610s][debug  ][aot         ]                         ro_cnt   ro_bytes     % |   rw_cnt   rw_bytes     % |  all_cnt  all_bytes     %
> [18.610s][debug  ][aot         ] MethodCounters      :        0          0   0.0 |    22471    1438144   6.2 |    22471    1438144   2.6
> 
> Before this patch for the assembly phase:
> 
> [6.680s][debug][aot         ]                         ro_cnt   ro_bytes     % |   rw_cnt   rw_bytes     % |  all_cnt  all_bytes     %
> [6.680s][debug][aot         ] MethodCounters      :        0          0   0.0 |     8588     549632   2.5 |     8588     549632   1.0
> 
> 
> After this patch for the training run:
> 
> [49.371s][debug  ][aot         ]                         ro_cnt   ro_bytes     % |   rw_cnt   rw_bytes     % |  all_cnt  all_bytes     %
> [49.371s][debug  ][aot         ] MethodTrainingData  :        0          0   0.0 |     4658     521696   2.1 |     4658     521696   0.9
> 
> 
> After this patch for the assembly phase:
> 
> [12.580s][debug][aot         ]                         ro_cnt   ro_bytes     % |   rw_cnt   rw_bytes     % |  all_cnt  all_bytes     %
> [12.580s][debug][aot         ] MethodTrainingData  :        0          0   0.0 |     4658     521696   2.1 |     4658     521696   0.9

They are not used right now but @vnkozlov is going to use them for the A4 recompilation strategy.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28670#issuecomment-3621638038


More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list