RFR: 8373114: Redundant MethodCounters in the preimage generated by training run
Igor Veresov
iveresov at openjdk.org
Mon Dec 8 18:12:09 UTC 2025
On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 22:16:03 GMT, Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Details are mentioned in the bug report and this mail thread https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/leyden-dev/2025-December/002843.html
> After this patch the number of MethodCounters in the preimage are much less than before this patch. Also the number of MethodCounters in the preimage is the same as in the final AOTCache (these numbers are obtained using -Xlog:aot=trace).
>
> Before this patch for the training run:
>
> [18.610s][debug ][aot ] ro_cnt ro_bytes % | rw_cnt rw_bytes % | all_cnt all_bytes %
> [18.610s][debug ][aot ] MethodCounters : 0 0 0.0 | 22471 1438144 6.2 | 22471 1438144 2.6
>
> Before this patch for the assembly phase:
>
> [6.680s][debug][aot ] ro_cnt ro_bytes % | rw_cnt rw_bytes % | all_cnt all_bytes %
> [6.680s][debug][aot ] MethodCounters : 0 0 0.0 | 8588 549632 2.5 | 8588 549632 1.0
>
>
> After this patch for the training run:
>
> [49.371s][debug ][aot ] ro_cnt ro_bytes % | rw_cnt rw_bytes % | all_cnt all_bytes %
> [49.371s][debug ][aot ] MethodTrainingData : 0 0 0.0 | 4658 521696 2.1 | 4658 521696 0.9
>
>
> After this patch for the assembly phase:
>
> [12.580s][debug][aot ] ro_cnt ro_bytes % | rw_cnt rw_bytes % | all_cnt all_bytes %
> [12.580s][debug][aot ] MethodTrainingData : 0 0 0.0 | 4658 521696 2.1 | 4658 521696 0.9
Yes, but caching is a runtime thing it's not really need in the archive. But for your work we probably do need it.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28670#issuecomment-3628370410
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list