RFR: 8317453: NMT: Performance benchmarks are needed to measure speed and memory
David Holmes
dholmes at openjdk.org
Thu Jan 16 22:30:33 UTC 2025
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:12:45 GMT, Gerard Ziemski <gziemski at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Here is another, hopefully, closer to the final iteration of NMT benchmarking mechanism.
>
> To use, you first need to record the pattern of operations, ex:
>
> `./build/macosx-aarch64-server-release/xcode/build/jdk/bin/java -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:NMTRecordMemoryAllocations=0x7FFFFFFF -jar build/macosx-aarch64-server-release/images/jdk/demo/jfc/J2Ddemo/J2Ddemo.jar`
>
> This will run the target app, and log all the allocations in chronological order. This will produce a few files:
> - hs_nmt_pid22770_allocs_record.log (is the chronological record of the the desired operations)
> - hs_nmt_pid22770_info_record.log (is the record of default NMT memory overhead and the NMT state)
> - hs_nmt_pid22770_threads_record.log (is the record of thread names that can be retrieved later when processing)
>
> Now you can use those recording to actually benchmark your proposed changes, ex:
>
> `./build/macosx-aarch64-server-release/xcode/build/jdk/bin/java -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:NMTBenchmarkRecordedPID=22770 -XX:NMTBenchmarkRecordedLoops=10`
>
> Which will produce yet another file:
>
> - hs_nmt_pid23527_benchmark.log
>
> that contains the details of the session, which can be further processed and analyzed by a tool, such as the one in jdk/src/utils/nmt, however, if you are looking just for one performance number look for `time:2744190[ns] [samples:115263]` in the output.
>
> The total time for this particular run is 2,744,190 nanosecond or ~2.7 seconds, which you can use to compare `before` and `after` your change.
@gerard-ziemski we should not have a bunch of Java files for this in the hotspot source tree. Benchmarks should be in the test tree somewhere. Can this not be integrated into existing benchmark frameworks i.e. JMH?
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23115#issuecomment-2597036137
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list