RFC: 8347707: Standardise the use of os::snprintf and os::snprintf_checked
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Fri Jul 25 01:54:49 UTC 2025
This is a proposal to standardize on the use of os::snprintf and
os::snprintf_checked across the hotspot code base, and to disallow use
of the C library variants. (It does not touch use of jio_printf at all.)
From: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347707
The platform `snprintf/vsnprintf` returns -1 on error, else if the
buffer is large enough returns the number of bytes written (excluding
the null byte), else (buffer is too small) the number of characters
(excluding the terminating null byte) which would have been written to
the final string if enough space had been available. Thus, a return
value of size or more means that the output was truncated.
To provide a consistent approach to error handling and truncation
management, we provide `os::xxx` wrapper functions as described below
and forbid the use of the library `::vsnprintf` and `::snprintf`.
The potential errors are, generally speaking, not something we should
encounter in our own well-written code:
- encoding error: not applicable as we are not using extended character sets
- invalid parameters (null buffers, specifying a limit > size of the
buffer [Windows], things of this nature)
- mal-formed formatting directives
- overflow error (POSIX) if the required buffer size exceeds INT_MAX (as
we return `int`).
As these should simply never occur, we handle the checks for -1 at the
lowest-level (`os::vsnprintf`) with an assertion, and accompanying
precondition assertions.
The potential clients of this API then fall into a number of camps:
1. Those who have sized their buffer correctly, don't need the return
value for subsequent use, and for whom truncation (if it were possible)
would be a programming error.
For these clients we have `void os::snprintf_checked` - which returns
nothing and asserts on truncation.
2. Those who have sized their buffer correctly, but do need the return
value for subsequent operations (e.g. chains of `snprintf` where you
advance the buffer pointer based on previous writes), but again for whom
truncation should never happen.
For these clients we have `os::snprintf`, but they have to add their own
assertion for no truncation.
3. Those who present a buffer but know that truncation is a possibility,
but don't need to do anything about it themselves, and for whom the
return value is of no use.
These clients also use `os::snprintf_checked`. The truncation assertion
can be useful for guiding buffer sizing decisions, but in product mode
truncation is not an error.
4. Those who present a buffer but know that truncation is a possibility,
and either need to handle it themselves, or else need to use the return
value in subsequent operations.
These clients are also directed to use `os::snprintf`.
In summary we provide the following API:
- `[[nodiscard]] int os::vsnprintf` is the building block for the other
methods, it:
- asserts on precondition failures
- asserts on error
- guarantees null-termination in the case of unexpected errors (as
the standards are still unclear on that point
- is declared `[[nodiscard[]]` so that callers cannot ignore the
return value (they can explicitly cast to `void` to indicate they dn't
need it)
- `void os::snprintf_checked`
- calls `os::vnsprintf`` so asserts on errors
- asserts on truncation
- [[nodiscard]] int os::snprintf
- calls `os::vnsprintf`` so asserts on errors
In terms of the effects on the existing code we:
- Change callers of `::snprintf`/`os::snprintf` that ignore the return
value and ensure the buffer is large enough to use `os::snprintf_checked`
- those that allow truncation to happen must use `os::snprintf`.
- Change all callers of `::snprintf`/`os::snprintf` that use the return
value to use `os::snprintf`, plus any additional assertions needed
- Change the 9 callers of `os::snprintf_checked` that do use the return
value, to use `os::snprintf` with their own assertions added
- Callers of `os::vnsprintf` are adjusted as needed
There is a draft PR comprising of multiple dependent commits so that you
can view things in stages. There has been a suggestion to integrate this
in a staged way under different JBS issues to make reviewing easier.
There are 46 modified files. The bulk of changes replace calls to
snprintf/os::snprintf with calls to os::snprintf_checked.
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26470
Comments welcomed.
Thanks,
David
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list