RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v7]

[Srinivas Vamsi Parasa]

On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:23:22 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa <sparasa at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The goal of this PR is to fix the performance regression in Arrays.fill() x86 stubs caused by masked AVX stores. The fix is to replace the masked AVX stores with store instructions without masks (i.e. unmasked stores). `fill32_masked()` and `fill64_masked()` stubs are replaced with `fill32_unmasked()` and `fill64_unmasked()` respectively.
>> 
>> To speedup unmasked stores, array fills for sizes < 64 bytes are broken down into sequences of 32B, 16B, 8B, 4B, 2B and 1B stores, depending on the size.
>> 
>> 
>> ### **Performance comparison for byte array fills in a loop for 1 million times**
>> 
>> 
>> UseAVX=3   ByteArray Size | +OptimizeFill    (Masked store   stub)     [secs] | -OptimizeFill   (No stub)   [secs] | --->This PR: +OptimizeFill   (Unmasked store   stub)   [secs]
>> -- | -- | -- | --
>> 1 | 0.46 | 0.14 | 0.185
>> 2 | 0.46 | 0.16 | 0.195
>> 3 | 0.46 | 0.176 | 0.199
>> 4 | 0.46 | 0.244 | 0.207
>> 5 | 0.46 | 0.29 | 0.32
>> 10 | 0.46 | 0.58 | 0.303
>> 15 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.271
>> 16 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.32
>> 17 | 0.21 | 0.5 | 0.299
>> 20 | 0.21 | 0.37 | 0.299
>> 25 | 0.21 | 0.59 | 0.282
>> 31 | 0.21 | 0.53 | 0.273
>> 32 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 0.199
>> 35 | 0.5 | 0.77 | 0.259
>> 40 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 0.33
>> 45 | 0.5 | 0.52 | 0.281
>> 48 | 0.5 | 0.66 | 0.32
>> 49 | 0.22 | 0.69 | 0.3
>> 50 | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.3
>> 55 | 0.22 | 0.67 | 0.292
>> 60 | 0.22 | 0.67 | 0.3293
>> 64 | 0.22 | 0.82 | 0.23
>> 70 | 0.51 | 1.1 | 0.34
>> 80 | 0.49 | 0.89 | 0.365
>> 90 | 0.225 | 0.68 | 0.33
>> 100 | 0.54 | 1.09 | 0.347
>> 110 | 0.6 | 0.98 | 0.36
>> 120 | 0.26 | 0.75 | 0.386
>> 128 | 0.266 | 1.1 | 0.289
>
> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   remove all masked stores altogether

src/hotspot/cpu/x86/macroAssembler_x86.cpp line 5775:

> 5773:     decrement(cnt);
> 5774:     jccb(Assembler::greaterEqual, LOOP);
> 5775:     jmp(DONE);

Verified that this jmpb to jmp change is needed.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28442#discussion_r2557733111