RFR: 8372528: Unify atomic exchange and compare exchange [v2]

Wed Nov 26 10:20:16 UTC 2025

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 09:37:15 GMT, Kim Barrett <kbarrett at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Shouldn't there also be some updates to test_atomicAccess.cpp?

Right. You are correct. Forgot that we had AtomicAccess as well as Atomic.

> I don't think we need this check. Just assume it's true, and we'll get a link error if that ever changes,
which is really not expected.

Removed it from the tests.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28498#issuecomment-3580609969