RFR: 8366847: JFR reports incorrect number of cores on hybrid CPU [v3]

Yasumasa Suenaga ysuenaga at openjdk.org
Fri Oct 3 12:42:52 UTC 2025


On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 06:53:26 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Okay but this is not a JFR specific change - you are changing these values for all clients of the VM version info.

Yes, so I think this PR needs reviewer(s) from HotSpot folks.

> So the current code would do:

Unfortunately, no. It would derive wrong number of sockets as following:


_no_of_threads = 28  // 2 sockets * (6 P-cores * 2 threads + 2 E-cores)
threads_per_core()  = 2   // HT enabled
cores_per_cpu() = 7 // ** different from your thought ** 14 threads per cpu / 2 logical processors
threads_per_package = 14 // 2 threads per core * 7 cores per cpu
_no_of_sockets = 2 // 28 threads / 14 threads per package


`cores_per_cpu()` would return `CPUID` leaf 0Bh for modern Intel CPU as following. According to Software Developer's Manual, leaf 0Bh returns number of "logical" processor in each domains (selected by subleaf (ECX)).


  if (is_intel()) {
    bool supports_topology = supports_processor_topology();
    if (supports_topology) {
      result = _cpuid_info.tpl_cpuidB1_ebx.bits.logical_cpus /
               _cpuid_info.tpl_cpuidB0_ebx.bits.logical_cpus;
    }


In this PR, all of variables are same with current implementation, thus we can calculate `_no_of_sockets` correctly. But only `threads_per_package` comes from `CPUID`.


_no_of_threads = 28  // 2 sockets * (6 P-cores * 2 threads + 2 E-cores)
threads_per_core()  = 2   // HT enabled
cores_per_cpu() = 7 // incorrect, but it would be calculated by values from `CPUID`
threads_per_package = 14 // ** different from current implementation ** the value from `CPUID`
_no_of_sockets = 2 // 28 threads / 14 threads per package


I uploaded test code for `CPUID` leaf  0Bh: https://github.com/YaSuenag/garakuta/blob/master/check-hybrid-cores/hy-core-check.c

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27080#discussion_r2401759645


More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list