RFR: 8368897: RISC-V: Cleanup RV_EXT_FEATURE_FLAGS & RV_NON_EXT_FEATURE_FLAGS [v4]

[Robbin Ehn]

On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 04:32:58 GMT, Fei Yang <fyang at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hamlin Li has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   order RV_NON_EXT_FEATURE_FLAGS
>
> src/hotspot/cpu/riscv/macroAssembler_riscv.cpp line 5877:
> 
>> 5875: // you want to use it elsewhere, note that cnt must be >= zicboz_block_size.
>> 5876: void MacroAssembler::zero_dcache_blocks(Register base, Register cnt, Register tmp1, Register tmp2) {
>> 5877:   int zicboz_block_size = VM_Version::non_ext_ZicbozBlockSize.value();
> 
> Hi, I am a bit concerned that the names might be too long. Say you have something like `VM_Version::non_ext_zicboz_block_size`.
> How about introducing some extra namespaces if we want to distinguish these two groups (extensions and non-extensions)?
> Then we could have something like `VM_Version::non_ext::zicboz_block_size`, `VM_Version::ext::rvi`, `VM_Version::ext::rvm`. What do you think?

Yes, maybe.

I just don't understand why vector length is something different than zicboz block size.
E.g.

CacheLineSize                             // gets cache-line size
VM_Version::ext::zic64b();                // gets 64b cache-line size
VM_Version::non_ext::zicboz_block_size(); // gets cache block size
VM_Version::cpu_vector_length();          // private, gets vector register length (HW), should be size not length IMHO
MaxVectorSize                             // gets vector register length (-+ cmd-line)


When I am actually using these value in MASM/stubs/instrinsic/etc.. I don't care where this value came from.
If it's command line or RVI extension or if we with some other mean figured this setting out.

I think it would be nice to try to get a consistent API in VM_Version.
But I don't think that is possible (due to global flags), but I think we can at least do something better here, no?

As it is now it really hard to review as I need to double check if the correct setting was used.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27562#discussion_r2409520786