RFR: 8375046: C2: Assertion failed in GrowableArray::remove_till(0) [v5]
Kim Barrett
kbarrett at openjdk.org
Mon Jan 19 17:04:22 UTC 2026
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 10:31:35 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Seen this assert in stress CTW runs:
>>
>>
>> # Internal Error (/home/shade/trunks/jdk/src/hotspot/share/utilities/growableArray.hpp:498), pid=2972347, tid=2973775
>> # assert(start < end && end <= this->_len) failed: erase called with invalid range (0, 0) for length 0
>>
>> Stack: [0x00007fd660bea000,0x00007fd660cea000], sp=0x00007fd660ce4fc0, free space=1003k
>> Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
>> V [libjvm.so+0xc00a41] Compile::inline_incrementally_one()+0x801 (growableArray.hpp:498)
>> V [libjvm.so+0xc01650] Compile::inline_incrementally(PhaseIterGVN&)+0x2f0 (compile.cpp:2212)
>> V [libjvm.so+0xc04581] Compile::Optimize()+0x7d1 (compile.cpp:2357)
>>
>>
>> It looks innocuous, as `GrowableArray::remove_range` does nothing real on `[0, 0)`. It is still IMO a bug to call it with `[0, 0)`, as it is not clear whether to trust inclusive or exclusive boundary. But for `remove_till`, it looks plausible that `remove_till(0)` should work and be a no-op. Looks like it readily happens in C2 CTW when `_late_inlines` is empty.
>>
>> Additional testing:
>> - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, additional new gtest to verify `remove_range` works
>> - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, `all`
>
> Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 10 additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Missing case
> - More tests
> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8375046-growable-array-till-zero
> - Revert
> - Leave only the C2 fix
> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8375046-growable-array-till-zero
> - Only clear pos when needed
> - Handle the C2 side by removing/inlining remove_till
> - No trailing comma
> - Fix
Looks good.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by kbarrett (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29171#pullrequestreview-3679014527
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list