RFR: 8375621: Move RBTree implementation to inline file to minimize included headers [v2]

[Johan Sjölen]

On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:54:32 GMT, Casper Norrbin <cnorrbin at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> The red-black tree implementation is split across `rbTree.hpp` and `rbTree.inline.hpp`. Some small `AbstractRBTree` functions are kept in `rbTree.hpp`, and also all of `RBTree`'s implementation. This makes the file less readable and requires extra header inclusions, notably the `os` class, which in turn includes additional unnecessary dependancies.
>> 
>> In this PR I have moved all implementation code `rbTree.inline.hpp` instead. As a result, `rbTree.hpp` now only contains declarations, making it cleaner and limiting header inclusions to what is strictly necessary. Implementation-specific headers are now only included in the inline file.
>> 
>> Additionally, I changed `RBTreeCHeapAllocator` to use `AllocateHeap`/`FreeHeap` from `allocation` instead of `os::malloc`/`os::free`, which allows us to get rid of the `os` dependancy altogether.
>> 
>> Note: This PR is dependant on #29082, which adds arena-style tree allocators, which this PR then moves to the inline file.
>> 
>> Testing:
>> - Oracle tiers 1-5
>
> Casper Norrbin has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   feedback fixes

Marked as reviewed by jsjolen (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29295#pullrequestreview-3691288585