Negative durations?

[Neo Jia]

Is that because you are going the call minor GC but failed and switch
to a full GC? I remember I have seen something like this before.

Thanks,
Neo

On Jan 3, 2008 7:34 AM, Keith Holdaway <Keith.Holdaway at sas.com> wrote:
> I have Google'd, but found no explanation for negative GC pauses:
>
> 8829.092: [GC 426933K->375154K(517760K), 0.0117606 secs]
> 8830.373: [GC 427634K->376403K(517760K), 0.0833584 secs]
> 8830.569: [GC 428883K->377941K(517760K), -0.6576383 secs]
> 8831.110: [GC 430421K->379175K(517760K), 0.0161026 secs]
> 8831.548: [GC 431628K->379968K(517760K), 0.0134666 secs]
> 8831.942: [GC 432448K->379701K(517760K), -0.1804611 secs]
> 8832.718: [GC 432180K->382348K(517760K), 0.0836352 secs]
> 8832.303: [GC 434828K->382927K(517760K), 0.6898266 secs]
> 8833.482: [GC 435407K->384775K(517760K), -0.1111267 secs]
>
>
> Keith R Holdaway
> Java Development Technologies
>
> SAS...  The Power to Know
>
> Carpe Diem ...
>
> _______________________________________________
> hotspot-gc-use mailing list
> hotspot-gc-use at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/hotspot-gc-use
>



-- 
I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious
probably today we haven't the technology we are using!
_______________________________________________
hotspot-gc-use mailing list
hotspot-gc-use at openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/hotspot-gc-use