Review request (S): 7131791 G1: Asserts in nightly testing due to 6976060
Bengt Rutisson
bengt.rutisson at oracle.com
Fri Jan 20 16:46:24 UTC 2012
Stefan,
Thanks for the prompt review!
Comments inline.
On 2012-01-20 17:21, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
> On 20 jan 2012, at 17:06, Bengt Rutisson <bengt.rutisson at oracle.com
> <mailto:bengt.rutisson at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Can I have a couple of quick reviews for this small change:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/7131791/webrev.02
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ebrutisso/7131791/webrev.02>
>>
>> This should hopefully fix the 500+ failures in the G1 nightlies. So,
>> I would like to get it in before the nightlies tonight.
>>
>> The issue is that we call collect() which will trigger a collection
>> without protecting the memory that we just allocated for a humongous
>> object. The fix (thanks Tony for helping me out!!!) is to fake an
>> object and create a handle to it before we call collect.
>
> 1067 Handle h((oop)result);
> 1068 collect(GCCause::_g1_humongous_allocation);
> 1069 }
> 1070 return result;
> 1071 }
> Can we really have a handle to uninitialized memory?
The memory is not uninitialized since I fake an object there with the
call to CollectedHeap::fill_with_object(result, word_size, false); just
before the code you have above.
> Are you sure that the humongous object will not be moved by a full collection. You should probably return h() instead of result.
Humongous objects will not be moved by G1 collections so I think we are ok.
Thanks for the prompt review!
Bengt
>
> StefanK
>
>>
>> Bengt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20120120/5adb2fb7/attachment.htm>
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list