RFR(XS): 7193946: Move warnings associated with UseMemSetInBOT flag
Bengt Rutisson
bengt.rutisson at oracle.com
Fri Sep 14 06:39:21 UTC 2012
Hi John,
Thanks for fixing this!
It looks good to me. I'm not really sure about how the work in
arguments.cpp is supposed to be divided. You added the new check to
Arguments::parse() but I guess it would be possible to put the code into
Snippet Arguments::check_vm_args_consistency() instead. It looks to me
like it might fit better there, but I am fine with leaving it in
Arguments::parse() as well. Just glad to get rid of the duplicated code.
Thanks,
Bengt
On 2012-09-13 18:58, John Cuthbertson wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Can I have a couple of volunteers review the changes for this CR? They
> are fairly small. The webrev can be found at:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~johnc/7193946/webrev.0/
>
> Summary:
> In the review comments for the fix for 7192128, Bengt suggested to
> move the individual warnings from concurrentMarkSweepGeneration.cpp
> and g1Collectedheap.cpp and place a single warning in a common piece
> of code. These changes address that review comment. The suggested
> location (vm_version_sparc.cpp) was unsuitable as the routine which
> would be the natural choice is called twice and the warning would be
> issued twice. A better place is when we check the other GC flags for
> consistency in arguments.cpp.
>
> Testing:
> * command line testing
> * GC basher and GCOld on sun4v with and without UseMemSetInBOT set
>
> Thanks,
>
> JohnC
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list