Review request: 8022880: False sharing between PSPromotionManager instances

Bengt Rutisson bengt.rutisson at oracle.com
Tue Aug 13 12:34:44 UTC 2013


Hi Stefan,

Looks good!

Bengt


On 8/13/13 1:38 PM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8022880/webrev.00/
>
> We've seen a couple of instances of false sharing when accessing 
> fields from the beginning and the end of the PSPromotionManager 
> instances. This both decreases the performance of the Parallel 
> Scavenge young GC and makes it hard to do reliable GC benchmarks on 
> bigger machines.
>
> This was first seen in:
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7196911 : command 
> line length affects performance
>
> The patch makes sure that each PSPromotionManager starts at a 
> cache-line-aligned address and is padded to have a cache-line-aligned 
> size.
>
> It doesn't use the exiting Padded<T> class, since it (unnecessarily) 
> wastes too much memory, but instead introduces a PaddedEnd<T> class. 
> This class only pads enough to get the cache-line-aligned size and 
> it's up to the user to align the start of the instance. This works 
> well in this specific case, where all the PSPromotionManagers are 
> together in an Array. A PaddedArray<T> class was added to hide the 
> memory layout code.
>
> Testing:
>
> 1) JPRT
>
> 2) SPECjbb2005 - 2 socket, 8 core, HT machine on JDK8-b57 + recent 
> HotSpot + the patch
>
> Flags:
> -showversion -Xmx29g -Xms29g -Xmn27g -XX:SurvivorRatio=60 
> -XX:TargetSurvivorRatio=90 -XX:ParallelGCThreads=16 
> -XX:AllocatePrefetchDistance=256 -XX:AllocatePrefetchLines=4 
> -XX:LoopUnrollLimit=45 -XX:InitialTenuringThreshold=12 
> -XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=15 -XX:InlineSmallCode=4300 
> -XX:MaxInlineSize=270 -XX:FreqInlineSize=2700 -XX:+AggressiveOpts 
> -XX:+UseParallelOldGC -XX:-UseAdaptiveSizePolicy -XX:+PrintGC
>
> Young GC times without cache aligned PSPromotionManager (ms):
> 36.1608
> 36.0164
> 36.3001
> 36.0763
> 36.2086
> 35.8151
>
> with cache aligned PSPromotionManager:
> 26.2168
> 26.9931
> 27.3672
> 26.5155
> 26.0182
> 26.8202
>
> Extra thanks goes to Claes Redestad for helping out with performance 
> analysis and implementation-detail discussions.
>
> thanks,
> StefanK




More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list