Request for review: JDK-8005602 NPG: classunloading does not happen while CMS GC with -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled is used

Mikael Gerdin mikael.gerdin at oracle.com
Mon Mar 4 14:44:55 UTC 2013


Hi all,

Please review this change to enable CMS to hand back memory for unloaded 
classes when running in concurrent mode.

Bug link:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8005602
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mgerdin/8005602/webrev.4/


The core change in this patch is the inserted call in sweep():
6101
6102   if (should_unload_classes()) {
6103     ClassLoaderDataGraph::purge();
6104   }
6105

This is needed because even though we claim to perform "class unloading" 
in the final remark phase we can't deallocate the memory for classes 
until after we've performed the sweep phase since the sweeper needs to 
find the size of objects even though they and their class is not 
considered live anymore.

The rest of the changes in concurrentMarkSweepGeneration.cpp only relate 
to logging information about released metaspace memory and cms gen 
occupancy to make it easier to analyze what's happening. An example of 
this new logging output is:

134.069: [CMS-concurrent-sweep-start]
134.073: [CMS-concurrent-sweep: 0.004/0.004 secs] [Times: user=0.00 
sys=0.02, real=0.01 secs]
134.164: [CMS-resizing: [CMS: 532K->382K(63488K)], [Metaspace: 
277487K->133228K(370885K/412976K)] ]
134.166: [CMS-concurrent-reset-start]
134.179: [CMS-concurrent-reset: 0.014/0.014 secs] [Times: user=0.02 
sys=0.00, real=0.02 secs]

The change in genCollectedHeap.cpp is needed to avoid artificially 
inflating the size of the Metaspace memory, since memory is considered 
"used" until purge() has been called. By calling purge() before 
compute_new_size() (as the other collectors do) we use the correct figures.

The disabled assert in metaspace.cpp is faulty because a thread may be 
allocating classes and expanding the metaspace memory while we are in 
compute_new_size, I've verified that this assert can in fact fail on a 
build without these changes.
The change in ~SpaceManager is because of lock order restrictions, 
sum_capacity_in_chunks_in_use takes the Metaspace lock and would do it 
out of order with regards to the expand_lock.

I've tested these changes primarily by running the ParallelClassLoading 
tests with a small young gen size to enable regular class unloading cycles.

Thanks
/Mikael



More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list