RFR (S): 8010294: Refactor HeapInspection to make it more reusable

[Erik Helin]

All,

I have updated the change based on feedback from Bengt and Jesper.

Differences between webrev.01 and webrev.02:
- Added #else clause in HeapInspection::start_of_perm_gen to make sure
   that no compilers will isse any warnings.
- Removed the variable need_epilogue in
   HeapInspection::instance_inspection, just kept the comment.
- Updated the @bug annotation of the test to the correct bug number,
   8010294.

New webrev located at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ehelin/8010294/webrev.02/

Thanks,
Erik

On 03/25/2013 12:29 PM, Erik Helin wrote:
> Bengt,
>
> On 03/25/2013 11:58 AM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>>
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>> Changes look good!
>>
>> One minor nit. I think the test contains the wrong bug number:
>>
>> * @bug 8004924
>
> Agree, I will fix.
>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
>> Bengt
>>
>> On 3/25/13 9:32 AM, Erik Helin wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I have updated the change based on internal feedback.
>>>
>>> The changes between webrev.00 and webrev.01 are mostly in the test code:
>>> - The test uses correct @summary description
>>> - The test now uses the correct command line flags
>>> - The test is more documented to describe how the test code is run
>>>
>>> There is also a very minor change in the hotspot code. I am now using
>>> the operator != instead of operator > when comparing the missed count.
>>> This was done just to make the diff one line smaller :)
>>>
>>> Please see new webrev at:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ehelin/8010294/webrev.01/
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Erik
>>>
>>> On 03/22/2013 10:06 AM, Erik Helin wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have refactored the HeapInspection class to prepare for the
>>>> vm/gc/detailed/object_count_after_gc event.
>>>>
>>>> The refactoring mainly consists of breaking up the rather long
>>>> heap_inspect function to multiple small functions that can be reused.
>>>>
>>>> I also moved the public enums used to initialize KlassInfoTable and
>>>> KlassInfoHisto to private constants. Now they no longer have to be
>>>> passed as an argument to the constructor.
>>>>
>>>> I also added a test to ensure that my refactoring did not break
>>>> anything
>>>> (the test is not that extensive but at least it ensures that the basic
>>>> stuff is working).
>>>>
>>>> Webrev:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ehelin/8010294/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> Bug:
>>>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8010294
>>>>
>>>> Testing:
>>>> - JPRT
>>>> - A new jtreg test (see webrev)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Erik
>>>
>>
>>
>