RFR (S): 8010294: Refactor HeapInspection to make it more reusable

[Erik Helin]

Hi Mikael,

thanks for reviewing!

On 03/25/2013 02:28 PM, Mikael Gerdin wrote:
> Erik,
>
>
> On 2013-03-25 09:32, Erik Helin wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I have updated the change based on internal feedback.
>>
>> The changes between webrev.00 and webrev.01 are mostly in the test code:
>> - The test uses correct @summary description
>> - The test now uses the correct command line flags
>> - The test is more documented to describe how the test code is run
>>
>> There is also a very minor change in the hotspot code. I am now using
>> the operator != instead of operator > when comparing the missed count.
>> This was done just to make the diff one line smaller :)
>>
>> Please see new webrev at:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ehelin/8010294/webrev.01/
>
> This looks good,
> I have some small comments but I'll leave it to you to decide if you
> want to fix them or not.
>
> When you're changing this line, would you mind adding a space before
> "true"?
>    _elements = new (ResourceObj::C_HEAP, mtInternal)
> GrowableArray<KlassInfoEntry*>(_histo_initial_size,true);
>

Sure, I will add the space before I push.

> Did you consider using
> SharedHeap::heap() instead of:
>      SharedHeap* sh = (SharedHeap*)Universe::heap();
>

Nope, did not know about this, thanks for the tip! I will update the 
code before I push.

Thanks,
Erik

> Either way, ship it.
> /Mikael
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Erik
>>
>> On 03/22/2013 10:06 AM, Erik Helin wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have refactored the HeapInspection class to prepare for the
>>> vm/gc/detailed/object_count_after_gc event.
>>>
>>> The refactoring mainly consists of breaking up the rather long
>>> heap_inspect function to multiple small functions that can be reused.
>>>
>>> I also moved the public enums used to initialize KlassInfoTable and
>>> KlassInfoHisto to private constants. Now they no longer have to be
>>> passed as an argument to the constructor.
>>>
>>> I also added a test to ensure that my refactoring did not break anything
>>> (the test is not that extensive but at least it ensures that the basic
>>> stuff is working).
>>>
>>> Webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ehelin/8010294/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Bug:
>>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8010294
>>>
>>> Testing:
>>> - JPRT
>>> - A new jtreg test (see webrev)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Erik
>>