Request for review: 8010518 Move deprecating CMSIncrementalMode from Arguments::check_deprecated_gcs() to Arguments::check_deprecated_gc_flags()

[Tao Mao]

Please see inline.
Tao

On 3/25/13 9:56 PM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>
> Hi Tao,
>
> Thanks for updating the tests. Looks good to me.
>
> Have you tried running the tests? It is a very small change so it 
> should be ok. But our testing process is very strange and it may be 
> that these tests are not run until PIT testing, so running them once 
> before pushing is a good idea to avoid unnecessary issues later on.
They have passed the jtreg tests. I'm going to push it.

script:
jtreg -jdk:/Users/tamao/home/jdk1.8.0_b74_macosx/ \
-vmoption:-tamao \
./src/8010518MoveDeprecatingCMSIncrementalMode/test/gc/startup_warnings/TestCMSIncrementalMode.java 
\
./src/8010518MoveDeprecatingCMSIncrementalMode/test/gc/startup_warnings/TestIncGC.java

results:
Test results: passed: 2
Report written to /Users/tamao/Dropbox/Oracle/JTreport/html/report.html
Results written to /Users/tamao/Dropbox/Oracle/JTwork
>
> Also, I see that you decided not to remove "likely" from the other 
> messages in Arguments::check_deprecated_gcs(). Would you like to do 
> that as a separate change or do you think we should leave those 
> messages unchanged?
So what was the decision for deprecating these gc's? To me, there hasn't 
seemed to be any definitive decision, yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Bengt
>
> On 3/25/13 7:48 PM, Tao Mao wrote:
>> Thank you for pointing it out, Bengt. A new webrev is updated.
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tamao/8010518/webrev.02/
>>
>> Please see inline.
>> Tao
>>
>> On 3/24/13 1:16 PM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Tao,
>>>
>>> On 3/23/13 4:51 AM, Tao Mao wrote:
>>>> Thank you for review and suggestion. A new webrev is updated.
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tamao/8010518/webrev.01/
>>>
>>> I like Jon's suggestion about removing the word "likely" but that 
>>> means that you need to update these tests:
>>>
>>> test/gc/startup_warnings/TestCMSIncrementalMode.java
>>> test/gc/startup_warnings/TestIncGC.java
>> Test files modified.
>>>
>>> Also, would it make sense to remove the word "likely" from the 
>>> warning messages in Arguments::check_deprecated_gcs() too? In that 
>>> case you need to update these tests as well:
>>>
>>> test/gc/startup_warnings/TestDefNewCMS.java
>>> test/gc/startup_warnings/TestParNewSerialOld.java
>> Have we made a decision to certainly remove these gc comb's in 
>> future? If so, it's OK to state so. Anyway, it would be better to 
>> resolve it with a separate CR.
>>>
>>> Bengt
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tao
>>>>
>>>> On 3/22/13 1:56 PM, Jon Masamitsu wrote:
>>>>> Tao,
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes look fine.  I would remove the "likely" so that messages 
>>>>> read like
>>>>>
>>>>> "and will be removed in a future release"
>>>>>
>>>>> Fewer words are better and the intent is still clear.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/21/2013 4:23 PM, Tao Mao wrote:
>>>>>> A simple changeset. Need a reviewer!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 8010518 Move deprecating CMSIncrementalMode from 
>>>>>> Arguments::check_deprecated_gcs() to 
>>>>>> Arguments::check_deprecated_gc_flags()
>>>>>> https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8010518
>>>>>>
>>>>>> webrev:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tamao/8010518/webrev.00/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> changeset:
>>>>>> Cleanup suggested by Bengt.
>>>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20130327/9e3e3bf0/attachment.htm>