loss of cause??

Richard Warburton richard.warburton at gmail.com
Thu Oct 10 14:35:47 UTC 2013


Hi,

We chose to not add the GC cause to all gc log records since we felt that
> was too large a change for 7.
> The previous behavior was completely inconsistent, all the different GC:s
> had different ways of signaling that a full gc was caused by a Systm.gc()
> call and System.gc() was the only gc cause which was logged.
>
> In 8 we decided to enable gc cause printing for all gc log records.
>

Thanks for explaining the decision.  Does this mean that every (most)
PrintGCDetails related GC Log record type will change by default in Java 8
in order to print the cause?

regards,

  Dr. Richard Warburton

  http://insightfullogic.com
  @RichardWarburto <http://twitter.com/richardwarburto>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20131010/c4fed47c/attachment.htm>


More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list