RFR 8065579: WB method to start G1 concurrent mark cycle should be introduced

[Leonid Mesnik]

Thank you for reviewing and pushing fix.

Leonid
On 27.11.2014 16:17, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 09:25 +0100, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 02:10 +0300, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Could I have review from Reviewer for this fix?
>> - gcCause.cpp:
>>
>> Is it possible to let the human readable string be similar to the
>> others? I.e. "WhiteBox Initiated Concurrent Mark" instead of "WhiteBox
>> Initiated ConcurrentMarkCycle"?
>>
>> - WhiteBox.java:
>>
>> In the comment, please start sentences with capital letters. Also add
>> punctuation if it is a full sentence. All but this and the "force xy GC"
>> follow this style.
>>
>> - TestConcMarkCycleWB.java
>>
>> The test needs to install sun.hotspot.WhiteBox$WhiteBoxPermission too.
>> There is a typo in the @summary line: relatd->related
>>
>   Leonid asked me to put up a new webrev with the suggested fixes plus
> fixes of the copyright header in the test, and addition of the @bug tag
> in the same.
>
> Here is the new webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8065579-leonid/webrev/
>
> I will sponsor the change.
>
> Thanks,
>    Thomas
>
>