RFR: 8059614: [TESTBUG] Test for JDK-8024366 (Make UseNUMA enable UseNUMAInterleaving)

[Andrey Zakharov]

HI
Jon, could you please review this tests? Could you advice someone else 
to review it too?
Thanks.

On 14.10.2014 20:46, Andrey Zakharov wrote:
> So, as we discussed with Jon about this test:
>
> on windows with 8 sockets (fx-sqe28.ru.oracle.com) with 8u40 jdk:
> *$ jtreg -nr -va -testjdk:$JAVA_HOME 
> k:/vmsqe/home/anzakhar/hs-gc/hotspot/test/gc/arguments/TestUseNUMAInterleaving.java*
> gives me:
> Command line: [c:\Users\gtee\tsts\jdk1.8.0_40\bin\java.exe 
> -XX:+UseNUMA -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version ]
> UseNUMA                                  := false
> false
> STDERR:
> STATUS:Passed.
>
> And
> *$ jtreg -nr -va -vmoptions:'-XX:+ForceNUMA' -testjdk:$JAVA_HOME 
> k:/vmsqe/home/anzakhar/hs-gc/hotspot/test/gc/arguments/TestUseNUMAInterleaving.java*
> STDOUT:
> Command line: [c:\Users\gtee\tsts\jdk1.8.0_40\bin\java.exe 
> -XX:+ForceNUMA -XX:+UseNUMA -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version ]
> null
> null
> STDERR:
> STATUS:Passed.
>
>
> Without NUMA support test will passed as per design.
> Thanks.
>
> On 07.10.2014 19:10, Dmitry Fazunenko wrote:
>> Looks good.
>>
>>
>> On 07.10.2014 14:26, Andrey Zakharov wrote:
>>> Hi, team!
>>>
>>> Here is simple patch to test for testing that UseNUMAInterleaving 
>>> option enabled by UseNUMA for all GC.
>>> Test is simple -
>>> if UseNUMA is enabled after vm initialization - tests that 
>>> UseNUMAInterleaving is enabled too,
>>> else test just passes.
>>>
>>> I've tested it both on box with NUMA support and without.
>>> it works as expected.
>>> Also, I've tested in aurora here: 601643.ute.hs_jtreg.accept.full
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fzhinkin/azakharov/8059614/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> bug:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8024366
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20141017/8e9d1aed/attachment.htm>