RFR: 8059614: [TESTBUG] Test for JDK-8024366 (Make UseNUMA enable UseNUMAInterleaving)

[Andrey Zakharov]

Yes, Dmitry is an author for JDK9 project, so I think I have 2 positives 
reviews.
Jon, could you please be a sponsor for this patch?

Thanks!

On 21.10.2014 02:28, Jon Masamitsu wrote:
> Andrey,
>
> Test looks good.  You have Dmitry's review, yes?  Do you
> need another in addition to mine?
>
> Jon
>
> On 10/17/14 3:27 AM, Andrey Zakharov wrote:
>> HI
>> Jon, could you please review this tests? Could you advice someone 
>> else to review it too?
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On 14.10.2014 20:46, Andrey Zakharov wrote:
>>> So, as we discussed with Jon about this test:
>>>
>>> on windows with 8 sockets (fx-sqe28.ru.oracle.com) with 8u40 jdk:
>>> *$ jtreg -nr -va -testjdk:$JAVA_HOME 
>>> k:/vmsqe/home/anzakhar/hs-gc/hotspot/test/gc/arguments/TestUseNUMAInterleaving.java*
>>> gives me:
>>> Command line: [c:\Users\gtee\tsts\jdk1.8.0_40\bin\java.exe 
>>> -XX:+UseNUMA -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version ]
>>> UseNUMA                                  := false
>>> false
>>> STDERR:
>>> STATUS:Passed.
>>>
>>> And
>>> *$ jtreg -nr -va -vmoptions:'-XX:+ForceNUMA' -testjdk:$JAVA_HOME 
>>> k:/vmsqe/home/anzakhar/hs-gc/hotspot/test/gc/arguments/TestUseNUMAInterleaving.java*
>>> STDOUT:
>>> Command line: [c:\Users\gtee\tsts\jdk1.8.0_40\bin\java.exe 
>>> -XX:+ForceNUMA -XX:+UseNUMA -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal -version ]
>>> null
>>> null
>>> STDERR:
>>> STATUS:Passed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Without NUMA support test will passed as per design.
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> On 07.10.2014 19:10, Dmitry Fazunenko wrote:
>>>> Looks good.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 07.10.2014 14:26, Andrey Zakharov wrote:
>>>>> Hi, team!
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is simple patch to test for testing that UseNUMAInterleaving 
>>>>> option enabled by UseNUMA for all GC.
>>>>> Test is simple -
>>>>> if UseNUMA is enabled after vm initialization - tests that 
>>>>> UseNUMAInterleaving is enabled too,
>>>>> else test just passes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've tested it both on box with NUMA support and without.
>>>>> it works as expected.
>>>>> Also, I've tested in aurora here: 601643.ute.hs_jtreg.accept.full
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> webrev:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fzhinkin/azakharov/8059614/webrev.00/
>>>>>
>>>>> bug:
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8024366
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20141021/4a0e087d/attachment.htm>