RFR: 8076457: Fix includes of inline.hpp in GC code

[Jon Masamitsu]

On 4/1/2015 1:03 PM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
> On 2015-04-01 21:09, Jon Masamitsu wrote:
>> Changes look correct.  Small question.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8076457/webrev.01/src/share/vm/runtime/thread.cpp.udiff.html 
>>
>>
>> +// Non-inlined version to be used where thread.inline.hpp shouldn't 
>> be included.
>>
>>
>> Would this be more accurate?
>>
>> // Non-inlined version to be used where thread.inline.hpp does not 
>> need to be included
>>
>> Minor point.  You can decide.  I don'tneed  to see the final comment.
>
> I wanted to convey that it's a way out for places where we are not 
> "allowed" to include thread.inline.hpp. Given that, if you still think 
> your version is better, I'll change it to your wording.

If that is what you wanted to convey, then your comment is correct.

Jon

>
>> Reviewed.
>
> Thanks!
>
>>
>> The changes do a bit more than deal with includes of various 
>> *.inline.hpp.
>
> What part are you referring to? The added includes, forward 
> declarations and the Thread::current_noinline() are all needed to be 
> able to get rid of the inline.hpp includes.
>
> Thanks,
> StefanK
>>
>> Should the description of in the CR be a more general
>>
>> "Fix more includes in GC code".
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076457
>>
>> Jon
>>
>>
>> On 4/1/2015 4:51 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review this patch to fix the last few places in the GC code 
>>> where inline.hpp files are included from hpp files.
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stefank/8076457/webrev.01/
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076457
>>>
>>> This patch builds upon the patch in:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/2015-April/012607.html 
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> StefanK
>>
>