RFR: 8079080: ConcurrentMark::mark_stack_push(oop) is unused

[Jon Masamitsu]

On 4/30/2015 11:31 AM, Kim Barrett wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2015, at 3:57 AM, Thomas Schatzl <thomas.schatzl at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi Kim,
>>
>> On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 19:42 -0400, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>> Please review this cleanup of ConcurrentMark and CMMarkStack.
>>>
>>> The following functions were unused, so are being removed:
>>>
>>> - ConcurrentMark::mark_stack_push(oop) - the other overload is used and retained.
>>> - CMMarkStack::push(oop)
>>> - CMMarkStack::par_push(oop)
>>> - CMMarkStack::par_adjoin_arr(oop*, int)
>>>
>>> In addition, CMMarkStack::pop() is only used in the implementation of
>>> CMMarkStack::drain(), so is being made private.
>>>
>>> CR:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8079080
>>>
>>> Webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8079080/webrev.00/
>>>
>> while cleaning up there, could you also remove the following places:
>>
>> - "friend class CMGlobalObjectClosure" - there is no
>> CMGlobalObjectClosure class
>>
>> - CMMarkStack::_max_stack can be removed. While the member is updated in
>> non-product builds, the value is never used anywhere.
>>
>> - CMMarkStack::isFull() is not referenced
>>
>> - maybe in the declaration of ConcurrentMark::_remark_mark_times and
>> ConcurrentMark::_remark_weak_ref_times the extra space could be removed.
> Yay!  More code to delete!
>
> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8079080/webrev.01/
>
> Incremental webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8079080/webrev.01.incr/
>

Reviewed.

Jon