RFR (M): 8060697: Improve G1 Heap Growth Heuristics

[Kim Barrett]

On Dec 4, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Tom Benson <tom.benson at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kim,
> Thanks again.  In this case, I actually prefer an explicit cast rather than relying on the presence of ".0" at the end of the compound expression to get the correct result.  However, I could get rid of the second cast. What would you think of that, and would you want to see a new webrev?

Any of the options discussed, including leaving as is, is ok with me.  And no, I don’t need another webrev.