JNI Weak Reference

Srinivas Ramakrishna ysr1729 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 4 01:03:26 UTC 2015


Yes, unfortunately, I don't think Jni refs procsing is parallelized, but should be. Please file a bug...

--- Ramki


ysr1729

> On Feb 3, 2015, at 16:19, Bill Hastings <bllhastings at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes -XX:+ParallelRefProcEnabled is enabled.
> 
> Thanks
> Bill.
> 
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:09 PM, charlie hunt <charlie.hunt at oracle.com> wrote:
>> You might try enabling -XX:+ParallelRefProcEnabled.
>> 
>> This will enable multi-threaded reference processing.
>> 
>> User CPU time vs real time coupled with the JNI Weak Reference time suggests single threaded reference processing.
>> 
>> hths,
>> 
>> charlie
>> 
>> 
>>> On 02/03/2015 05:20 PM, Bill Hastings wrote:
>>> Periodically get this in my CMS GC log:
>>> 
>>> 2015-02-03T03:24:27.419-0800: 17917.047: [Rescan (parallel) , 0.0625400 secs]2015-02-03T03:24:27.482-0800: 17917.110: [weak refs processing2015-02-03T03:24:27.482-0800: 17917.110: [SoftReference, 1 refs, 0.0010820 secs]2015-02-03T03:24:27.483-0800: 17917.111: [WeakReference, 0 refs, 0.0015340 secs]2015-02-03T03:24:27.484-0800: 17917.112: [FinalReference, 0 refs, 0.0007930 secs]2015-02-03T03:24:27.485-0800: 17917.113: [PhantomReference, 0 refs, 0.0008860 secs]2015-02-03T03:24:27.486-0800: 17917.114: [JNI Weak Reference, 6.1104040 secs], 6.1148360 secs]2015-02-03T03:24:33.596-0800: 17923.225: [scrub string table, 0.0006670 secs] [1 CMS-remark:         531682K(5242880K)] 1827698K(7759488K), 6.1785190 secs] [Times: user=7.22 sys=0.00, real=6.18 secs]
>>> 
>>> JNI Weak References processing take several seconds. How do I remedy this? I use JNA but I do not use any WeakReference classes in my application.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Bill
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20150203/a3544d32/attachment.htm>


More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list