RFR: 8079080: ConcurrentMark::mark_stack_push(oop) is unused

[Thomas Schatzl]

Hi Kim,

On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 14:31 -0400, Kim Barrett wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2015, at 3:57 AM, Thomas Schatzl <thomas.schatzl at oracle.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Kim,
> > 
> > On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 19:42 -0400, Kim Barrett wrote:
> >> Please review this cleanup of ConcurrentMark and CMMarkStack.
> >> 
> >> The following functions were unused, so are being removed:
> >> 
> >> - ConcurrentMark::mark_stack_push(oop) - the other overload is used and retained.
> >> - CMMarkStack::push(oop)
> >> - CMMarkStack::par_push(oop)
> >> - CMMarkStack::par_adjoin_arr(oop*, int)
> >> 
> >> In addition, CMMarkStack::pop() is only used in the implementation of
> >> CMMarkStack::drain(), so is being made private.
> >> 
> >> CR:
> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8079080
> >> 
> >> Webrev:
> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8079080/webrev.00/
> >> 
> > 
> > while cleaning up there, could you also remove the following places:
> > 
> > - "friend class CMGlobalObjectClosure" - there is no
> > CMGlobalObjectClosure class
> > 
> > - CMMarkStack::_max_stack can be removed. While the member is updated in
> > non-product builds, the value is never used anywhere.
> > 
> > - CMMarkStack::isFull() is not referenced
> > 
> > - maybe in the declaration of ConcurrentMark::_remark_mark_times and
> > ConcurrentMark::_remark_weak_ref_times the extra space could be removed.
> 
> Yay!  More code to delete!
> 
> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8079080/webrev.01/
> 
> Incremental webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8079080/webrev.01.incr/
> 

Looks good.

Thanks,
  Thomas