JDK-8152428: Logging should handle that the PreserveCMReferents phase is not always executed

[Bengt Rutisson]

Thanks Tom and Jon for looking at this.

However, I withdraw this review request since the change for JDK-8152952 
evolved to solve JDK-8152428 too.

Thanks,
Bengt

On 2016-03-30 07:26, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-03-29 20:59, Tom Benson wrote:
>> Hi Bengt,
>> Looks good to me.
>
> Thanks Tom!
>
> Bengt
>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 3/29/2016 8:49 AM, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> I've changed the title of the bug to:
>>>
>>> "Logging should handle that the PreserveCMReferents phase is not 
>>> always executed"
>>>
>>> This represents more what the bug is about.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bengt
>>>
>>> On 2016-03-29 14:08, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Could I have a couple of reviews for this patch?
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~brutisso/8152428/webrev.00/
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152428
>>>>
>>>> There are circumstances where preserve_cm_referents() is never 
>>>> called and thus there is no data to log for the PreserveCMReferents 
>>>> phase.
>>>>
>>>> Based on the changes for JDK-8152952 it is possible to identify 
>>>> that a phase was not used and then skip logging it.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Bengt
>>>
>>
>