JEP 291: Deprecate the Concurrent Mark Sweep (CMS) Garbage Collector

[Jeremy Manson]

For those following along at home, the meeting happened last week.  We took
notes, which are linked from the bug:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8142518

The current plan for followup is to set up a meeting for the end of August,
and then a f2f during JavaOne.

Jeremy

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jeremy Manson <jeremymanson at google.com>
wrote:

> I was drafting an agenda.  My expectation is that the meeting will go
> something like this:
>
> Introductions
>
> Discussion of motivations for JEP 291 (Jon M)
>
> Discussions of concerns about JEP 291 (roundtable)
>
> Discussion / Brainstorming about potential ways forward, as well as an
> understanding of what level of commitment organizations are willing to make.
>
> Discussion of action items and followup.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> For me it's to see if there are enough folks who are willing *and*
>> capable (to be blunt, it will need the backing of large companies) of
>> maintaining CMS as a collector going forwards (it's important to several
>> of our customers).  If that's a yes then I'd hope to have a technical
>> discussion around the options of how we could achieve that without causing
>> a major headache for the Oracle GC engineers.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 20 July 2016 at 23:50, Jon Masamitsu <jon.masamitsu at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What are peoples expectations for this meeting?
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On 07/18/2016 10:16 AM, Jeremy Manson wrote:
>>>
>>> Presumably, everyone will be happy with meeting notes rather than an
>>> actual recording.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, I'll add:
>>>
>>> ysr1729 at gmail.com
>>> mark.reinhold at oracle.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:13 AM, <kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com>
>>> kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com <kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ok we can record if everyone is open to that.
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 18, 2016, at 7:48 AM, Jeremy Manson <jeremymanson at google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Richard - I'll bring someone who can take readable notes. :)
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 5:07 AM, <kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com>
>>>> kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com < <kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com>
>>>> kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Richard,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it’s in everyone’s interest to keep this out in the open.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Kirk
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 16, 2016, at 1:34 AM, Richard Warburton <
>>>>> <richard.warburton at gmail.com>richard.warburton at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds as if the consensus is a telephone / video conference in the
>>>>>> near term, and then a F2F during / close to JavaOne.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> People who want to be invited include:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <kirk at kodewerk.com>kirk at kodewerk.com
>>>>>> <aph at redhat.com>aph at redhat.com
>>>>>> <volker.simonis at gmail.com>volker.simonis at gmail.com
>>>>>> <jon.masamitsu at oracle.com>jon.masamitsu at oracle.com
>>>>>> <jeremymanson at google.com>jeremymanson at google.com
>>>>>> <martijnverburg at gmail.com>martijnverburg at gmail.com
>>>>>> <jwha at google.com>jwha at google.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did I miss anyone?  We can take date / time planning and logistics
>>>>>> off-list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that this change affects a lot of organisations and people in
>>>>> the wider Java community I think it would be really appreciated that a
>>>>> brief summary of the discussion be published somewhere in public. Maybe
>>>>> this mailing list?
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>   Richard Warburton
>>>>>
>>>>>   <http://insightfullogic.com/>http://insightfullogic.com
>>>>>   @RichardWarburto <http://twitter.com/richardwarburto>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20160801/9ff1725c/attachment.htm>