RFR: 8158412: [TESTBUG] TestIHOPErgo and TestStressG1Humongous should not be executed when JFR is enabled

Michail Chernov michail.chernov at oracle.com
Tue Jun 14 18:50:41 UTC 2016


HI Thomas, Dima

Thanks for your comments.

Properties expression were changed to "!vm.flightRecorder".

Updated webrev (hotspot) : 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchernov/8158412/webrev.hotspot.01/

Michail

On 06/14/2016 04:33 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 16:23 +0300, Dmitry Fazunenko wrote:
>> Michail,
>>
>> On 14.06.2016 15:22, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>>> Hi Mikael,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 16:49 +0300, 8038818: Test Chernov wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Could I have a reviews for this small fix? The fix adds new
>>>> custom JTreg setting for @requires tag - vm.FlightRecorder. New
>>>> setting is used in all updated tests. Tests will be exclude if
>>>> JFR is enabled.
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158412
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchernov/8158412/webrev.root.00/
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchernov/8158412/webrev.hotspot.00/
>>>>
>>>> Testing - RBT.
>>>     seems okay, however the syntax to use vm.FlightRecorder seems
>>> awkward, i.e.
>>>
>>> "vm.FlighRecorder != true"
>>>
>>> Isn't there a way to make it something more common like
>>> !vm.FlightRecorder?
>>>
>>> Not insisting on this, just asking.
>> Yes, there is no need to use vm.xxx != true anymore, for those
>> properties which are set by our plugin (VMProps).
>> All such properties will never be set to 'null', as it's possible for
>> vm.opt.xxx, which are set by jtreg.
>> So, using !vm.FlightRecored is safe.
>    then I would prefer to use vm.FlightRecorder this way in the tests.
>
> Thanks,
>    Thomas
>
>




More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list