RFR (XS): 8165860: workgroup classes are missing volatile qualifiers for lock-free code

[Thomas Schatzl]

Hi,

On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 15:50 +0200, Mikael Gerdin wrote:
> Hi Erik,
> 
> On 2016-09-19 15:48, Erik Österlund wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Mikael Gerdin noticed a compiler workaround could be done in a
> > nicer-looking way.

  so just assigning the volatile to the temp is not sufficient to make
sure the compiler generates code to only read it once?

Thanks,
  Thomas