RFR(S): 8166462: Convert TestResourcehash_test to Gtest

[Kirill Zhaldybin]

Mikael,

Thank you for reviewing the fix!

Here are a new WebRev: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kzhaldyb/webrevs/JDK-8166462/webrev.01/
I switched to using static method calls instead of redefined operator().

Could you please let me know your opinion?

Thank you.

Regards, Kirill

On 28.09.2016 16:27, Mikael Gerdin wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
>
> On 2016-09-26 23:19, Kirill Zhaldybin wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Could you please review this fix for 8166462?
>>
>> After discussion with the author of the original test (Mikael Gerdin) a
>> few changes were done during conversion:
>> 1. removed "if not product" guards and checks for Resource Marks since
>> we believe that we are in controlled env and we cannot have any RM
>> 2. parametrized "small" test and removed "shifted small" test since they
>> were very similar and depended only on one parameter
>>
>> WebRev: 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kzhaldyb/webrevs/JDK-8166462/webrev.00/
>
> I think this change is overall ok but I'm not too fond of using 
> operator().
> I'd prefer if you kept the original variant of calling a static method 
> on class Runner instead.
>
> Something like:
>  63 class SmallResourceHashtableTest : public 
> CommonResourceHashtableTest {
>   64  protected:
>   65
>   66   template<
>   67   unsigned (*HASH) (K const&) = primitive_hash<K>,
>   68   bool (*EQUALS)(K const&, K const&) = primitive_equals<K>,
>   69   unsigned SIZE = 256,
>   70   ResourceObj::allocation_type ALLOC_TYPE = 
> ResourceObj::RESOURCE_AREA
>
>   71   >
>   72   class Runner : public AllStatic {
>
>
>   73    public:
>   74
>   75     static void test(V step) {
> ...
>
> The class is only there to allow template parameters with default 
> values anyway.
>
> /Mikael
>
>> CR:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166462
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Regards, Kirill