RFR: 8189171: Move GC argument processing into GC specific classes

[Bob Vandette]

Roman,

It looks like this change may have caused the build of the minimal VM to
fail.  The minimal VM is no longer a configuration that we regularly build and test
but it is still a build option that can be selected via "--with-jvm-variants=minimal1"


/scratch/users/bobv/jdk10hs/open/src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/gcArguments.cpp: In static member function 'static jint GCArguments::initialize()':
/scratch/users/bobv/jdk10hs/open/src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/gcArguments.cpp:113:17: error: 'defaultStream' has not been declared
     jio_fprintf(defaultStream::error_stream(), "UseParallelGC not supported in this VM.\n");
                 ^
/scratch/users/bobv/jdk10hs/open/src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/gcArguments.cpp:116:17: error: 'defaultStream' has not been declared
     jio_fprintf(defaultStream::error_stream(), "UseG1GC not supported in this VM.\n");
                 ^
/scratch/users/bobv/jdk10hs/open/src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/gcArguments.cpp:119:17: error: 'defaultStream' has not been declared
     jio_fprintf(defaultStream::error_stream(), "UseConcMarkSweepGC not supported in this VM.\n");
                 ^
gmake[3]: *** [/scratch/users/bobv/jdk10hs/build/b00/linux-x64-minimal1/hotspot/variant-minimal/libjvm/objs/gcArguments.o] Error 1

Bob.


> On Nov 7, 2017, at 6:01 AM, Roman Kennke <rkennke at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Per & Erik,
> 
> thanks for the reviews!
> 
> Now I need a sponsor.
> 
> Final webrev (same as before, including Reviewed-by line):
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/8189171/webrev.05/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erkennke/8189171/webrev.05/>
> 
> Thanks, Roman
> 
> 
>> Looks good Roman!
>> 
>> /Per
>> 
>> On 2017-11-06 12:13, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>> Am 26.10.2017 um 11:43 schrieb Per Liden:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> On 2017-10-25 18:11, Erik Osterlund wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> So let me just put your changes up for review (again), if you don't
>>>>>> mind:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Full webrev:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~eosterlund/8189171/webrev.03/
>>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eeosterlund/8189171/webrev.03/>
>>>> 
>>>> I like this. Just two naming suggestions:
>>>> 
>>>> src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/gcArguments.hpp:
>>>> 
>>>>   39   static jint create_instance();
>>>>   40   static bool is_initialized();
>>>>   41   static GCArguments* instance();
>>>> 
>>>> Could we call these:
>>>> 
>>>>   39   static jint initialize();
>>>>   40   static bool is_initialized();
>>>>   41   static GCArguments* arguments();
>>>> 
>>>> Reasoning: initialize() maps better to its companion is_initialized().
>>>> GCArguments::arguments() maps better to the existing patterns we have
>>>> with CollectedHeap::heap().
>>> Ok, that sounds good to me. Actually, it's almost full-circle back to my
>>> original proposal ;-)
>>> 
>>> Differential:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/8189171/webrev.04.diff/
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erkennke/8189171/webrev.04.diff/>
>>> Full:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/8189171/webrev.04/
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erkennke/8189171/webrev.04/>
>>> 
>>> Ok to push now?
>>> 
>>> Roman
> 
>