RFR: 8201362: Remove CollectedHeap::barrier_set()

[Thomas Stüfe]

Sure, give me a minute...

..Thomas

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Per Liden <per.liden at oracle.com> wrote:
> Ok, thanks Thomas!
>
> Do you want to double check that 8201362 doesn't break more stuff before I
> push it, or are we good to go?
>
> /Per
>
>
> On 04/12/2018 11:13 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>>
>> I pushed 8201475, all good now. Thanks.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Per,
>>>
>>> took a quick stab in the dark at
>>> src/hotspot/cpu/s390/templateTable_s390.cpp and it seems to miss, at
>>> first glance, barrierSet.hpp.
>>>
>>> Since ppc, s390 and aarch64 are already broken, could we please delay
>>> pushing this until 8201475 is resolved? An hour or so?
>>>
>>> Thanks, Thomas
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Roman Kennke <rkennke at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 12.04.2018 um 10:31 schrieb Aleksey Shipilev:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/12/2018 10:26 AM, Per Liden wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch removes the redundant CollectedHeap::_barrier_set and the
>>>>>> setter/getter. Throughout the code, we currently have a mix of calls
>>>>>> to BarrierSet::barrier_set()
>>>>>> and Universe::heap()->barrier_set(). This patch unifies all that to
>>>>>> always use
>>>>>> BarrierSet::barrier_set().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201362
>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pliden/8201362/webrev.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, please. This looks trivial.
>>>>>
>>>>> (If we are pushing this today, it is better to do this early, so we
>>>>> would be able to catch up with
>>>>> build errors before jdk/hs closing today)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't say it's trivial ;-) But the change looks good to me too and
>>>> is welcome. Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> Roman
>>>>
>>>>
>