RFR (S/M): 8159440: Move marking of promoted objects during initial mark into the concurrent phas
Thomas Schatzl
thomas.schatzl at oracle.com
Tue Dec 4 10:08:40 UTC 2018
Hi,
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 23:38 -0500, Kim Barrett wrote:
> > On Dec 3, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Thomas Schatzl <
> > thomas.schatzl at oracle.com> wrote:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8159440/webrev.0_to_1/ (diff)
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8159440/webrev.1/ (full)
>
> Nice. No need for a new webrev for the comments below.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> src/hotspot/share/gc/g1/g1ConcurrentMark.inline.hpp
> 79 add_to_liveness(worker_id, obj, obj->size());
>
> Why the change to no longer use the passed in obj_size argument?
>
> If this is correct, then we're no longer using the obj_size argument.
> It looks like no caller passes that argument, instead letting it
> default to 0. So the argument should just be eliminated. I'm okay
> with that being a separate cleanup.
We are no longer using the argument. I removed it.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> src/hotspot/share/gc/g1/g1ConcurrentMark.cpp
> 267 _root_regions = NEW_C_HEAP_ARRAY(HeapRegion*, max_regions,
> mtGC);
>
> Consider asserting _root_regions == NULL first.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
Added.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8159440/webrev.1_to_2/ (diff)
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/8159440/webrev.2/ (full)
Thanks,
Thomas
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list