RFR: JDK-8206457: Code paths from oop_iterate() must use barrier-free access

Roman Kennke rkennke at redhat.com
Thu Jul 26 14:02:02 UTC 2018


Am 26.07.2018 um 15:13 schrieb Erik Österlund:
> Hi Roman,
> 
> On 2018-07-26 13:09, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> Hi Erik,
>> thanks for reviewing!
>>
>>> In instanceRefKlass.inline.hpp:
>>>
>>> Are these changes to logging required for Shenandoah not to crash? It
>>> appears to me that for ZGC, it would print the wrong addresses if
>>> barriers were not used. That's why I wonder if this is a strict
>>> requirement or not for Shenandoah to work.
>> We do need to avoid read-barriers on those paths. The problem is that
>> during full-GC we temporarily don't have the fwd-ptr available (it's a
>> sliding mark-compact algorithm). However, we can work around this by not
>> using the base+offset variants like in the patch. However, this seems to
>> make the Access API unhappy at compile-time when using
>> ON_UNKNOWN_OOP_REF. Can you check this? I've no clue where to look.
> 
> The reason is that wherever ON_UNKNOWN_OOP_REF is used, the backend
> needs to be able to determine the exact strength. And to do that, the
> backend needs to be able to determine of this is a referent field. And
> to do that, it needs a base pointer.
> 
> I'm not 100% sure what I think is a good solution to this. I wonder if
> along the lines of introducing these resolve for read/write decorators
> (which it looks like we will be needing anyway), there could be a do not
> resolve decorator that could be passed in to determining how to resolve
> the access. Default for stores could be ACCESS_WRITE, for loads
> ACCESS_READ, for atomics ACCESS_READ | ACCESS_WRITE, and explicitly
> setting ACCESS_NONE meaning don't resolve this one. Maybe the prefix
> ought to be RESOLVE_READ / RESOLVE_WRITE / RESOLVE_NONE instead though
> to be more specific.

We are in instanceRefKlass, and we should be able to determine the
reference strength statically, and pass in the correct ON_XXX_OOP_REF
decorator, right? E.g. via InstanceKlass::reference_type() ? Or would
that not work?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20180726/f3fe1b43/signature.asc>


More information about the hotspot-gc-dev mailing list