RFR: 8204088: Dynamic Max Memory Limit
Rodrigo Bruno
rbruno at gsd.inesc-id.pt
Fri Jun 22 07:54:45 UTC 2018
Hi Per,
yes, I think we can definitely do that.
Thank you for your comment.
cheers,
Rodrigo
2018-06-20 18:32 GMT+02:00 Per Liden <per.liden at oracle.com>:
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> A general comment, which applies to both JDK-8204088 and JDK-8204089, is
> that I would like to see this code move into G1 itself. We should strive to
> avoid introducing global concepts and options that are not applicable to
> other GCs. I can't see anything obvious in neither JDK-8204088 nor
> JDK-8204089 that would stop you from doing that.
>
> cheers,
> Per
>
> On 06/19/2018 08:46 PM, Rodrigo Bruno wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> here is the first version of our contribution for draft JEP-8204088.
>>
>> More details at the CR.
>>
>> CR:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204088 <
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204088>
>> Webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/jelastic/cmx/ <
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tschatzl/jelastic/cmx/>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rodrigo
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/hotspot-gc-dev/attachments/20180622/4e0d3b19/attachment.htm>
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev
mailing list